Katharine Kolcaba Comfort Theory Essay

Katharine Kolcaba Comfort Theory Essay

Assignment 1: Theory Analysis (25 points) Review the instructions and grading rubric that follow this grid Submit paper to Turnitin by clicking on the Assignment in Week 3 Make any revisions necessary based on the Originality Report Submit by the posted due date by again clicking on Assignment in Week 3WEEKTOPICAL OUTLINEACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTSWeek 4Translating Research Evidence into Practice Importance of theory driven research and practice Research problems Qualitative research Quantitative research Sources of evidence Research critiqueReadings:  Polit and Beck: Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8Recommended Reading:Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: Quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing (BJN), 16(11), 658-663. (Historic but current and relevant).Kaplan, L. (2012). Reading and critiquing a research article. American Nurse Today, 7(10). (Historic but current and relevant)Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing), 16(12), 738-744. (Historic but current and relevant).Week 4 Content:Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 4 contentJournal Article(s):Davidson, J., Bagget, M., Zamora-Flyr, M., Giambattista, L., Lobbestael, L., Pfeiffer, J., &., Madani, C. (2017). Exploring the human emotion of feeling cared for during hospitalization. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 10(1), 1-9.Jennings, K. (2017). The Roy adaptation model: A theoretical framework for nurses providing care to individuals with anorexia nervosa. Advances in Nursing Science, 40(4), 370-383. Discussion Board Posting: (3 points)Selecting a research problem is the initial step in the research process. Research

Assignment 1: Theory Analysis (25 points)Assignment Criteria12 points10 points7 points0 pointsAll topics addressed and all questions fully answered. All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answeredAll topics/criteria addressed and most questions partially answered.One or more topics not addressed or completely answered. Quality/Accuracy of Information7 points5 points3 points0 pointsInformation clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic. A few details and/or examples are given. Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. Organization3 points 2 points1 point0 pointsInformation is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist. No levels of heading.The information or overall structure appears disorganized. Sources3 points2 points 1 points0 pointsAll references are from relevant peer-reviewed sources, within a 5-year timeframe or are classic sources. The majority of references from relevant peer-reviewed sources, within a 5-year timeframe or are classic sources. Some references are from non-peer-reviewed sources or are older than 5 years.Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed sources or are older than 5 years or Earned Points

Assignment 1: Theory Analysis

Assignment 1: Theory Analysis

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Criteria	12.0 ptsProficient All topics/criteria addressed, and all questions fully answered. 10.0 ptsCompetent All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answered. 7.0 ptsAdequate All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions partially answered. 0.0 ptsNovice One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered.	12.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality/Accuracy of Information	7.0 ptsProficient Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. 5.0 ptsCompetent Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples. 3.0 ptsAdequate Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given. 0.0 ptsNovice Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria.	7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization	3.0 ptsProficient Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. 2.0 ptsCompetent Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. 1.0 ptsAdequate There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist. No levels of heading. 0.0 ptsNovice The information or overall structure appears disorganized.	3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources	3.0 ptsProficient All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year time frame, or a classic/ historical source. 2.0 ptsCompetent The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year time frame or a classic/historical source. 1.0 ptsAdequate Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. 0.0 ptsNovice Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.	3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA	0.0 ptsAdequate 0.0 ptsCompetent 0.0 ptsNovice 0.0 ptsProficient Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.	0.0 pts
Total Points: 25.0

 

PreviousNext

 

 

Nova Southeastern University Ron and Kathy Assaf College of Nursing19NSG 5101: Theory and Research Activities and Assignments5.2.19: 2/3/2020LS 9.10.2020 DSAssignment 2: Research Critique (12 points)Assignment Instructions:For this assignment, students will critique either a quantitative or a qualitative research article. Select one of the articles posted in Week 4 Module.Assignment Criteria:1. Select a research article provided in the Week 4 Module.2. Copy and paste the appropriate research critique grid found in Week 4 into a new Word document.3. Complete each section of the research critique grid. The “Analysis” section of the research critique grid should be specific. Use bullet points for this section and support each yes/no analysis with comments.4. Critique the article and include the strengths and weaknesses.5. The research critique grid should be added as an appendix to this paper.6. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format 2-3 pages, excluding the title, reference and appendix pages.7. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, body (summary page) and a conclusion.8. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.9. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used. 10. Include the chosen article in the reference page.11. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations). 12. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.13. Submit by the posted due date. Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or gramma