analyzing the reasoning

analyzing the reasoning

Hi Need help responding to this post

Guided Response: Read the arguments presented by your classmates, and analyze the reasoning that they have presented. In particular, if you believe that their argument is invalid, explain a way in which it would be possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. If you believe that their argument has a false premise, explain why a reasonable person might take it to be false. Finally, see if you can help them to improve their argument. How can they alter their premises so that all of them are true? What might they change in order to make their argument valid?

Week 2 Discussion 1 Jason Brooks 2/15/2017 9:12:55 PM
Introduce 1: Social media is utilized for our own connections.

Preface 2: Social media is utilized for our business connections.

Preface 3: Social media gives us an alternate method for conveying.

Preface 4: Social media is changing our ways of life regular.

Conclusion: Social media is changing our methods for correspondence.

Every one of my premises and conclusion are valid, online networking has gone along way, giving us today a

diverse method for imparting, from business and individual connections. Making online networking

exceptionally well known, with all the distinctive systems administration locales that are out there today.

Week 2 Discussion 1 Cody Nicholas 2/16/2017 6:26:34 PM
Prompt question- Should athletes be allowed to use performance enhancing drugs or techniques?

Premise 1- Steroids can have long lasting negative physical and mental impacts on the body.

Premise 2- Steroids give the user an unfair advantage against those who don’t use steroids.

Premise 3- Steroids have long been illegal and covert, which puts the user at a heightened risk of

taking poorly constructed and dangerous substances.

Conclusion- Due to the fact that steroids can have a significant impact on health, frequently resulting in death, from the use and side effects of bad supplements, and the unfair advantage that steroids give the user over non users, steroid use should not be allowed by athletes at all.

week 2 discussion 1 Corey Beidler 2/16/2017 7:38:37 PM
P1. Torture is a faster means of obtaining information then question and answer interrogation.

P2. Sometimes when an important person is captured in the war on terror it is a time sensitive matter to get information quickly from the suspect.

P3. To potentially save the lives of thousands the life of one proven war criminal needs to be punished to get the right answers.

C: Therefore, torture is permissible under the right circumstances and with the proper guidelines on the methods used.

My conclusion follows my premises because it is permissible to torture known criminals within certain guidelines and restrictions with the importance and means to prevent innocent lives from dying or being severely injured. If there is clear evidence that an individual is a known criminal within an organization that aims to promote terror on a populace then they should be tortured to gain information in a quick manner.

 

Answers

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Do you need a similar assignment done from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code "save15" for a 15% Discount!

Request essay help

You can trust us for this and even for your future projects